Originally Posted by
Bunnychaser
Why would god give us the ability to question everything if we are not intended to question him, or the possibility of his inexistence?
Now, he brings up faith, and I counter by saying that faith is defined as belief that is not based on proof.
From here, it takes two turns. Either he says that it is your choice whether or not to have faith, or he says that people have proof of god.
The logical, and, mind you, the undeniable answer, is the first.
Lack of evidence against is not evidence for, therefore, there is no evidence for a god... Or against a god.
End of conversation.
(See, I almost have it rehearsed now on these forums.)
Don't worry, you should become a quantum scientist. They're good at that type of logic.
That way, if you believe hard enough, it may happen... Or something like that.
You know, trapping a cat in a box with a vial of acid and stuff.