Why I think limitation on amount of points you can win in an event is an outrage.

[Fay]

That's ridiculous. You going to punish skilled players from winning more event points because they're skilled? Everything about that screams no to me.

Everytime those events are hosted we can all guess who's gonna win most of the rounds. Most people won't even bother playing when those players participate. Having a max of +3 makes it so that the less skilled players can win in the event as well and actually have a chance to win some points. In my opinion a max of +3 isn't a punishment since you already won more than half of the obtainable points in the set.

[Linzor]

Everytime those events are hosted we can all guess who's gonna win most of the rounds. Most people won't even bother playing when those players participate. Having a max of +3 makes it so that the less skilled players can win in the event as well and actually have a chance to win some points. In my opinion a max of +3 isn't a punishment since you already won more than half of the obtainable points in the set.

That's still a punishment no matter how you look at it. You decreasing the amount they can win, it's not fair in any sense.

The fact you say "people won't even bother playing if they can't win" is bs. It never stopped people from joining the events from when even race was created, and even when I was ET there was the same people winning those events all the time, and even since then the race event in particular has never decreased in players and I don't think you see tons of less players in it now compared to all other events, unless you perhaps compare it to the most popular events but that's not a fair comparison.