Originally Posted by Dave View Post
You report them, you provide the evidence.
this is just wrong...
how are we suppose to know when a staff member will make a mistake that requires us to report them?
we have 3 options:
1. we record every single event and look for every little mistake so we can report(btw the only complaint i see from staff member about reports is "don't look for every little mistake we make so you can go and report us", this option will lead to exactly that.)
2. we don't record, and every single report we make will get declined on the spot.
3. asking for an ET to provide the report in event related reports will be allowed as long as there is a reason for that.

Originally Posted by Dave View Post
If you truly want to report a staff member, you can put the effort into it. We're not going to dig through screenshots and replays of a staff member just to figure out if you're right or wrong if you don't present a good case first.

It's not going to be made a requirement.
honestly you are missing the point, we don't report because we want someone to get into trouble, we report because we think someone did us wrong and we want someone to look into that. do you think we just wake up in the morning and be like umm imma report an ET today?

how are we(the community) suppose to trust you when we get our reports declined we weren't recording at the time? do you think we know when something like this is going to happen? and when something like this happens it's our fault for not recording?