Originally Posted by McSic View Post
So you mean both teams need to vote? If both teams need to agree on the draw, the enemy team could just vote no, as it gives them an advantage? I mean not everyone is fair and votes yes, and once you meet enough bad actors that vote no, you might just start voting no yourself in similar situations.
Given that the current system is based on being a fair and good player knowing that someone crashed to pause until a draw or play out a 3v3 with one sitting, this seems like it would be a step in the right direction towards having more fairness. Maybe a play with the percentage of "yes"s needed for a draw to include all of the disadvantaged team and only one player from the advantaged team?