Results 1 to 10 of 17

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Junior Member

    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Country
    Posts
    335
    Thanked
    206
    Thanks
    291
    Originally Posted by McSic View Post
    Point of concern is when people leave on purpose to /draw the round if they think they're about to lose the round. I think if we make that possible to happen, it will happen.
    I believe this suggestion comes from another server, and there the /draw command brings up a vote similar to kicking someone so the function can't be abused just because one team is losing

  2. #2
    McSic's Avatar L e a d e r

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    8,962
    Thanked
    556
    Thanks
    7,975
    Originally Posted by Skilly View Post
    I believe this suggestion comes from another server, and there the /draw command brings up a vote similar to kicking someone so the function can't be abused just because one team is losing
    So you mean both teams need to vote? If both teams need to agree on the draw, the enemy team could just vote no, as it gives them an advantage? I mean not everyone is fair and votes yes, and once you meet enough bad actors that vote no, you might just start voting no yourself in similar situations.

  3. #3
    Bunny's Avatar woof.

    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Country
    Posts
    5,301
    Thanked
    2,875
    Thanks
    1,247
    Originally Posted by McSic View Post
    So you mean both teams need to vote? If both teams need to agree on the draw, the enemy team could just vote no, as it gives them an advantage? I mean not everyone is fair and votes yes, and once you meet enough bad actors that vote no, you might just start voting no yourself in similar situations.
    Given that the current system is based on being a fair and good player knowing that someone crashed to pause until a draw or play out a 3v3 with one sitting, this seems like it would be a step in the right direction towards having more fairness. Maybe a play with the percentage of "yes"s needed for a draw to include all of the disadvantaged team and only one player from the advantaged team?

  4. #4
    Junior Member

    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Country
    Posts
    335
    Thanked
    206
    Thanks
    291
    Originally Posted by McSic View Post
    So you mean both teams need to vote? If both teams need to agree on the draw, the enemy team could just vote no, as it gives them an advantage?
    Yep. But generally speaking, people aren't so needy to win and just want to play a fair game. Of course there will be situations where one team is toxic and ignores the vote. The draw vote in this suggestion isn't designed to fix that issue, and it doesn't have to

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)