Clan War Mode !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Bunny]

So you mean both teams need to vote? If both teams need to agree on the draw, the enemy team could just vote no, as it gives them an advantage? I mean not everyone is fair and votes yes, and once you meet enough bad actors that vote no, you might just start voting no yourself in similar situations.

Given that the current system is based on being a fair and good player knowing that someone crashed to pause until a draw or play out a 3v3 with one sitting, this seems like it would be a step in the right direction towards having more fairness. Maybe a play with the percentage of "yes"s needed for a draw to include all of the disadvantaged team and only one player from the advantaged team?

[Skilly]

So you mean both teams need to vote? If both teams need to agree on the draw, the enemy team could just vote no, as it gives them an advantage?

Yep. But generally speaking, people aren't so needy to win and just want to play a fair game. Of course there will be situations where one team is toxic and ignores the vote. The draw vote in this suggestion isn't designed to fix that issue, and it doesn't have to

[McSic]

Given that the current system is based on being a fair and good player knowing that someone crashed to pause until a draw or play out a 3v3 with one sitting, this seems like it would be a step in the right direction towards having more fairness. Maybe a play with the percentage of "yes"s needed for a draw to include all of the disadvantaged team and only one player from the advantaged team?

Possible. I'd say > 66.67% (2/3) YES could work.

Given that the current system is based on being a fair and good player knowing that someone crashed to pause until a draw or play out a 3v3 with one sitting, this seems like it would be a step in the right direction towards having more fairness. Maybe a play with the percentage of "yes"s needed for a draw to include all of the disadvantaged team and only one player from the advantaged team?

Seems like the original idea is based on optimism and I can see it working for as long as the environment doesn't become too toxic. I think that competitive players that play to win CWs for coins or w/e will probably vote no to secure their wins or just to piss others off. I mean there's a reason why other games don't make this choice determined by both teams.

An idea I had on discord that's not dependent on both teams: If someone leaves within say like... first 10 seconds of the match, the match is automatically paused for up to 60 seconds and automatically unpaused and round restarted when the player rejoins. The exception to this case are players that get disconnected after 10 seconds. This fix wouldn't work for them.

[SunRui]

most cw players r good mannered & draw if someone doesnt connect, everyone sits when a teams down a member or waits until someone returns from afk. don’t think /draw will be abused, at least by the people currently playing cw

[McSic]

most cw players r good mannered & draw if someone doesnt connect, everyone sits when a teams down a member or waits until someone returns from afk. don’t think /draw will be abused, at least by the people currently playing cw

Alright.

[McSic]

Added in next update as /restart - starts a vote to restart the round.

[Ommadawn]

Added: https://freestylersworld.com/showthr...e-18-JULY-2023