Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 22
  1. #11
    slugheady's Avatar ୧༼***༽୨

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    5,703
    Thanked
    219
    Thanks
    1,414
    Originally Posted by Razer View Post
    How do you possibly test quality with screenshots vs gameplay?
    Well, you can look at the text / logo's and squares, imo their good quality.

    Ofcourse the recording story is different, but I'm wondering if there is a better option then the one I'm using. I sometimes have problems with interlacing, is there an easy method besides h264 with better quality then that?

  2. #12
    Banned

    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    733
    Thanked
    107
    Thanks
    168
    Originally Posted by slugheady View Post
    Well, you can look at the text / logo's and squares, imo their good quality.

    Ofcourse the recording story is different, but I'm wondering if there is a better option then the one I'm using. I sometimes have problems with interlacing, is there an easy method besides h264 with better quality then that?
    Yeah there's a lot. But you could render it with any options you want in 1920x1080, and use the text.. Doesn't make any noticeable change.

  3. #13
    slugheady's Avatar ୧༼***༽୨

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    5,703
    Thanked
    219
    Thanks
    1,414
    Originally Posted by Razer View Post
    Yeah there's a lot. But you could render it with any options you want in 1920x1080, and use the text.. Doesn't make any noticeable change.
    Okay so I found some old vids.

    What about these:

    - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gxste...7&feature=plcp
    - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rU6Bc...6&feature=plcp <-- my first video don't hate D: or one of my first, and I was young so just graphics D: owh only 720p.
    - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_zNf...1&feature=plcp

  4. #14
    Banned

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    1,194
    Thanked
    197
    Thanks
    255
    Originally Posted by slugheady View Post
    Okay so I found some old vids.



    What about these:

    - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gxste...7&feature=plcp
    - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rU6Bc...6&feature=plcp <-- my first video don't hate D: or one of my first, and I was young so just graphics D: owh only 720p.
    - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_zNf...1&feature=plcp
    Nothing is wrong with 720... Majority of the people don't even have a computer with graphics that can process 1080...

    Also go get sony vegas pro 11. Much better.

  5. #15
    slugheady's Avatar ୧༼***༽୨

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    5,703
    Thanked
    219
    Thanks
    1,414
    Originally Posted by Ariston View Post
    Nothing is wrong with 720... Majority of the people don't even have a computer with graphics that can process 1080...

    Also go get sony vegas pro 11. Much better.
    Ikr though I prefer 1080 x]

    I'm just wondering if there is an advanced easy method better then h264 which has no interlacing issues, perhaps you or razer know any.

  6. #16
    Banned

    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    733
    Thanked
    107
    Thanks
    168
    Originally Posted by slugheady View Post
    Ikr though I prefer 1080 x]

    I'm just wondering if there is an advanced easy method better then h264 which has no interlacing issues, perhaps you or razer know any.
    Ripbot. You get quality like this...


  7. #17
    slugheady's Avatar ୧༼***༽୨

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    5,703
    Thanked
    219
    Thanks
    1,414
    Originally Posted by Razer View Post
    Ripbot. You get quality like this...

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZqvN3...ure=plpp_video
    I'm talking about the export phase not the record phase.

  8. #18
    Banned

    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    733
    Thanked
    107
    Thanks
    168
    Originally Posted by slugheady View Post
    I'm talking about the export phase not the record phase.
    That's it....

    Recording is getting RAW footage, with maximized graphics INGAME. Then you try and KEEP those graphics and quality the WHOLE way through the post process.
    If this was rendered as uncompressed RAW footage... It'd be like a 20 GB file... But instead using the best codecs and render settings you get a compressed project with maximized quality and size.

    Efficiency.

  9. #19
    slugheady's Avatar ୧༼***༽୨

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    5,703
    Thanked
    219
    Thanks
    1,414
    Originally Posted by Razer View Post
    That's it....

    Recording is getting RAW footage, with maximized graphics INGAME. Then you try and KEEP those graphics and quality the WHOLE way through the post process.
    If this was rendered as uncompressed RAW footage... It'd be like a 20 GB file... But instead using the best codecs and render settings you get a compressed project with maximized quality and size.

    Efficiency.
    Do you understand the word "interlacing"?

  10. #20
    Banned

    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    733
    Thanked
    107
    Thanks
    168
    Originally Posted by slugheady View Post
    Do you understand the word "interlacing"?
    Yes, but you're comparing RAW footage, to Rendered footage.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)