Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 41 to 44 of 44
  1. #41
    Sparks's Avatar Freestyler

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    765
    Thanked
    146
    Thanks
    420
    Originally Posted by Bunnychaser View Post
    The main 'point' in those who are for gun control, is the difference between a weapon that is specifically designed to kill the most amount of people in the shortest amount of time, and a handgun or bolt action rifle used for hunting or self defense.

    A 'killing machine' is different than a gun.


    This is why there is such a huge argument over the definition of an assault rifle.

    Complete gun restriction is a radical idea. Stopping VTech and Columbine incidents is not.

    I am perfectly fine with a fully certified person having a concealed weapon around me at all times.

    Actually, there have been many statements of people who have been in close proximity to mass murders of how they have now bought a gun, or wished they had a gun at the time.

    I don't see why you need to own a weapon that can kill 100 people in a single minute... Much less carry one.








    All you people who argue that guns are bad because they are used to kill people simply refuse to acknowledge the fact that if someone has enough willpower to kill you, they do not need a gun to do it.
    Well, without a gun, it's way harder to kill me, and i prefer it that way.
    Complete gun restriction is not a radical idea, it's the only good idea that will work. Idk why you 'mericuns are so attached to ur guns, they are made to kill stuff, some do it better than others. Leave that shit for the army.
    And as for your statement regarding the people who wished they had a gun when close to a mass murder, well no shit sherlock, I'd love to have a ****in tank if i was close to a mass murder lmfao. That's the exact logic i'm talkin about, "I have a gun to protect myself from other people with guns". So just get rid of all the guns.

  2. #42
    Bunnychaser's Avatar Severe Tire Damage

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,213
    Thanked
    8
    Thanks
    364
    Originally Posted by Sparks View Post
    Well, without a gun, it's way harder to kill me, and i prefer it that way.
    Complete gun restriction is not a radical idea, it's the only good idea that will work. Idk why you 'mericuns are so attached to ur guns, they are made to kill stuff, some do it better than others. Leave that shit for the army.
    And as for your statement regarding the people who wished they had a gun when close to a mass murder, well no shit sherlock, I'd love to have a ****in tank if i was close to a mass murder lmfao. That's the exact logic i'm talkin about, "I have a gun to protect myself from other people with guns". So just get rid of all the guns.


    I'm not attached to guns at all, I have never owned one in my life and I believe I never will. I believe they are a waste of money.

    It's not as simple as 'taking away' all of the guns.
    Millions of people today are buying guns simply to have them grandfathered in by any of the laws that may be passed; a LARGE number of people will still have guns.
    We don't have the manpower to take away everyone's guns if they don't consent to bringing it in.
    We can't just search everyone's house.

    Basically, if a total gun ban is passed, we can't support it fully.
    It's not worth the money, or the time, logically, to do it.
    Don't it always seem to go
    That you don't know what you've got
    Til its gone
    They paved paradise
    And put up a parking lot
    Hey, now they paved paradise
    To put up a parking lot.

  3. #43
    Sparks's Avatar Freestyler

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    765
    Thanked
    146
    Thanks
    420
    Originally Posted by Bunnychaser View Post
    I'm not attached to guns at all, I have never owned one in my life and I believe I never will. I believe they are a waste of money.

    It's not as simple as 'taking away' all of the guns.
    Millions of people today are buying guns simply to have them grandfathered in by any of the laws that may be passed; a LARGE number of people will still have guns.
    We don't have the manpower to take away everyone's guns if they don't consent to bringing it in.
    We can't just search everyone's house.

    Basically, if a total gun ban is passed, we can't support it fully.
    It's not worth the money, or the time, logically, to do it.
    how is it not worth the money if guns are the main reason (imo, which i'm guessing u dont agree to) people are dying?
    Aren't lives suppose to be priceless?
    Also, if they're made illegal, they have a record of everyone that owns guns and hasn't brought them back yet, so technically they probably could get a warrant for that and search their house, or simply keep fining them until they return the guns.

  4. #44
    Freestyler

    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    408
    Thanked
    83
    Thanks
    321
    Yes or no there will always be positives and negatives without un natural death the world would be way too populated

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)