More C&C, Please?

[Quianmore]

Sorry, know I just posted one of these earlier.
Just finished this work and reviving threads anymore is near impossible.
I appreciate the C&C this community gives, because it's very good.

I know the little sparks off to the right don't look so hot, but how is it?



Things I've Tried To Improve From Signature 1:
- Issues with lighting
- Text flow and placement
- Light source matches render reflections
- Proper / Matching C4D

[Adam]

Sorry, know I just posted one of these earlier.
Just finished this work and reviving threads anymore is near impossible.
I appreciate the C&C this community gives, because it's very good.

I know the little sparks off to the right don't look so hot, but how is it?

http://i1103.photobucket.com/albums/...ps9c02e6f5.png

Things I've Tried To Improve From Signature 1:
- Issues with lighting
- Text flow and placement
- Light source matches render reflections
- Proper / Matching C4D

Something I've learned from people (Resort mainly) is to put a dot of white on a low setted brush, and the do the same with black on the more un necessary side of the signature. I personally think your last signature was better, though that doesn't mean this is bad.
I'd say maybe a 6-7/10.

Some of the blending seems a tad bit off, and those sparkily things don't really add on to make the signature better. I'll revisit this thread later since I just woke up. Then I'll give a bit more better CnC.

[Quianmore]

Something I've learned from people (Resort mainly) is to put a dot of white on a low setted brush, and the do the same with black on the more un necessary side of the signature. I personally think your last signature was better, though that doesn't mean this is bad.
I'd say maybe a 6-7/10.

Some of the blending seems a tad bit off, and those sparkily things don't really add on to make the signature better. I'll revisit this thread later since I just woke up. Then I'll give a bit more better CnC.

Thanks, though for attempting, haha.
Damn, I actually thought I did I relatively good job with it.
I'm terrible at graphics! D: Haha

[Nickachu]

I only like the IDEA of having those colors, it's really low quality, the lighting is messed up. the color usement is good but they're messed up since they have a gray-tint over them which kills the colors.
sorry dude but that tag is a complete no-go. I can't say anything good about it.

[Ommadawn]

Nice work. 10/10 ^^

[Resort]

Nice work. 10/10 ^^

You don't know what you're talking about.

[Mex]

Nice make me 1

[Divine]

Nice smudging with awesome colors that match up.

Text - 8/10

Overall 7/10

[Rhysin]

Thanks, though for attempting, haha.
Damn, I actually thought I did I relatively good job with it.
I'm terrible at graphics! D: Haha

You're way better than me.

For this sig, The render isn't blended in at all on the left side. The text is decent as always (don't change it!). The lighting is off and a bit too bright on her face. The quality seems low for some reason too. 4/10

[Quianmore]

Thanks for all of the C&Cs!

I'm noticing a lot of comments about the quality, and I want it to be known that the render I used was naturally low quality, so I degraded the C4D's to match because having a high quality surrounding area matched with a low quality focal point would just look utterly silly.

I know in graphics it's best to use higher / best quality renders, but this example was to test matching styles.
Not to display great graphic quality.