I lol'd

[PsyLight0150]

Sorry to be so up front about it but it seems there are some rumors going around that I am not the founder of psy style. I find this to be absolutely hilarious but also alarming at the same time. Noobcakes cannot be taking credit for the creation of my style. I'm sorry but that's the way it's gotta be. The hard work I put into creating psy style cannot be put to waste by a few weak rumors. So, if anyone claims to be the original creator of psy style, other than PsyLight, they are not. Even people on different servers will tell you that I am the founder. I made a tutorial video and am currently working on an updated version of that tutorial complete with newer combos and strategy tips. Let me also make this clear to you...

I HAVE NO ALTERNATE CHARACTERS.

Also, there are people that have helped me in advancing my style that I would like to give credit to.

Shivam, Jawarisin, and Dishsoap.

They helped me create more advanced combos after I had laid the basic framework for the style. I also think Dishsoap was the first person to teach me void... he had a char on a diff gunz server named SexDanish.

If you hear any crap that Wayne or one of the people above that I gave credit to created the style, then that is incorrect. The only Master and creator of Psy Style is PsyLight. There are still portions of psy style that have not been shared with ANYONE. Not even the closest apprentices.

Just clearing that up- I have the original psy style notes on 9 diff pages front and back in 2 of my notebooks. They map out psy style Strategy/Techniques/S combos/B combos. So rly. Don't even try to say that you made my style because it's just not possible.

If I catch anymore people trying to take credit for my style I'm ssing & /reporting for posing as me.

Have a good day. GG all.

As a side note: I'd like to say that NO, I did not name the style after myself. The style wasn't originally created on this private server. I originally was going to call it "Inferno Style" but that was taken according to feedback I recieved from one of my early students. So, in the process of the very first class, one of the students said "Hey why don't you name it Psy Style? Just like Monk had his style named after him." And it stuck. So no I'm not a crazy self-centered bish.

[Grascen]

Monk was not a style. Psy-style is not a style. Calling a branch off of an original style does not make it another style. You could term it Psy-strategies, Psy-combos, or something along the lines of naming your moves, but it all comes down to the simple fact that there is D-style(any stabbing weapons, usually with a lunge), K-style(any slashing weapons, usually with a flip), and E-style(playing the game with mostly guns, and not using any unforeseen glitches[K-style and D-style]), and that's it. H-style does not truely exist, as you cannot play with glitches as well as not, at the same time. Not to rain on your parade, but Monk-style and Psy-style both fall into the same categories as K-style, with their slashing weapons. It doesn't matter that you use 2x Giant Swords that have no block or flip. The plain, simple fact is that you are using a weapon that slashes, therefore, you are using a branch of K-style.

[rofl]

Monk was not a style. Psy-style is not a style. Calling a branch off of an original style does not make it another style. You could term it Psy-strategies, Psy-combos, or something along the lines of naming your moves, but it all comes down to the simple fact that there is D-style(any stabbing weapons, usually with a lunge), K-style(any slashing weapons, usually with a flip), and E-style(playing the game with mostly guns, and not using any unforeseen glitches[K-style and D-style]), and that's it. H-style does not truely exist, as you cannot play with glitches as well as not, at the same time. Not to rain on your parade, but Monk-style and Psy-style both fall into the same categories as K-style, with their slashing weapons. It doesn't matter that you use 2x Giant Swords that have no block or flip. The plain, simple fact is that you are using a weapon that slashes, therefore, you are using a branch of K-style.

Slapped by Grascen, no worries man I've been infracted it hurts just as much.

[PsyLight0150]

Monk was not a style. Psy-style is not a style. Calling a branch off of an original style does not make it another style. You could term it Psy-strategies, Psy-combos, or something along the lines of naming your moves, but it all comes down to the simple fact that there is D-style(any stabbing weapons, usually with a lunge), K-style(any slashing weapons, usually with a flip), and E-style(playing the game with mostly guns, and not using any unforeseen glitches[K-style and D-style]), and that's it. H-style does not truely exist, as you cannot play with glitches as well as not, at the same time. Not to rain on your parade, but Monk-style and Psy-style both fall into the same categories as K-style, with their slashing weapons. It doesn't matter that you use 2x Giant Swords that have no block or flip. The plain, simple fact is that you are using a weapon that slashes, therefore, you are using a branch of K-style.

I beg to differ... A style is defined by it's techniques/strategies and not by the nature of the weapon itself. To say that Psy Style and Monk Style are not styles and to use the umbrella term K-style for ALL styles is incorrect. For example: If a martial artist was using an karate and a different martial artist was using taekwondo, they could have seperate styles and still have the same weapon. What I'm saying is that it's your style that defines how you fight & move in different situations. Therefore, Monk Style and Psy Style are different Styles. They may be branches of K-style but they are clearly nowhere near the usual k-style strategy of using simple butterfly/double butterfly techniques. K-style and Monk style involve block canceling and flip to fight but Psy Style does not... and the result is a totally different way to fight. It doesn't matter if you think K-style is the end-all-be-all style that all terms can be collected under. It doesn't change the fact that the actual style of fighting and the moves, strategy, & combos differ greatly when compared to K-style. Even the slash timing is different. What you basically just said is that K-style is an umbrella term for all styles of sword fighting. Just like "empty hand" is an umbrella term for all styles of hand to hand combat. It doesn't matter how you look at it, Psy Style as a concept exists.

[rofl]

I beg to differ... A style is defined by it's techniques/strategies and not by the nature of the weapon itself. To say that Psy Style and Monk Style are not styles and to use the umbrella term K-style for ALL styles is incorrect. For example: If a martial artist was using an karate and a different martial artist was using taekwondo, they could have seperate styles and still have the same weapon. What I'm saying is that it's your style that defines how you fight & move in different situations. Therefore, Monk Style and Psy Style are different Styles. They may be branches of K-style but they are clearly nowhere near the usual k-style strategy of using simple butterfly/double butterfly techniques. K-style and Monk style involve block canceling and flip to fight but Psy Style does not... and the result is a totally different way to fight. It doesn't matter if you think K-style is the end-all-be-all style that all terms can be collected under. It doesn't change the fact that the actual style of fighting and the moves, strategy, & combos differ greatly when compared to K-style. Even the slash timing is different. What you basically just said is that K-style is an umbrella term for all styles of sword fighting. Just like "empty hand" is an umbrella term for all styles of hand to hand combat. It doesn't matter how you look at it, Psy Style as a concept exists.

Then it wouldn't be "Psy"-style, you're not the only one who ****s around with big swords, other people too..
hmm Big Sword Style.. BS STYLE LOLOLOLOL

[PsyLight0150]

Then it wouldn't be "Psy"-style, you're not the only one who ****s around with big swords, other people too..
hmm Big Sword Style.. BS STYLE LOLOLOLOL

Dude I don't think you see the point here. Psy Style is STRUCTURED. It CAN BE TAUGHT. It is NOT spamming slash or void. It has STRATEGY. It has TECHNIQUES. It has FUNDAMENTAL MOVE COMBOS THAT CAN BE STACKED. All the requirements to make it a style of fighting. It's not just "****ing around with big swords." Also, I DID NOT NAME MY OWN STYLE. MY STUDENTS CHOSE THE NAME. So don't think I'm self-centered or anything LOL. I know other people use big swords but without my style they are pretty nabbish you have to admit.

[rofl]

REALLY? AND I AM KINGZOR OF ALL KUKIEZ..
I SHALL MAEK KUK-STYLE BECAUSE I SHOULD BE RESPECTED AND ALL HAILED.

You make me pee hard.

[PsyLight0150]

REALLY? AND I AM KINGZOR OF ALL KUKIEZ..
I SHALL MAEK KUK-STYLE BECAUSE I SHOULD BE RESPECTED AND ALL HAILED.

You make me pee hard.

Really... How childish... Honestly I don't need your ego here...

[rofl]

I'm not ego'ing, you are, you are claiming a style as yours, and we sure as hell don't give a damn, maybe people will adopt your style, but no1 will call it psy style, YOU are ego'ing for putting your name in that, you just want to be remembered.. apparently i don't think every1 gives a damn, and will call it some other kind of style, BS style or w/e.
asdfasdfasdf

P.S. your sig is ego all over, no1 gives a damn if you got 68 kills in a duel, maybe just some AFK kid while no mods are on.

[PsyLight0150]

I'm not ego'ing, you are, you are claiming a style as yours, and we sure as hell don't give a damn, maybe people will adopt your style, but no1 will call it psy style, YOU are ego'ing for putting your name in that, you just want to be remembered.. apparently i don't think every1 gives a damn, and will call it some other kind of style, BS style or w/e.
asdfasdfasdf

P.S. your sig is ego all over, no1 gives a damn if you got 68 kills in a duel, maybe just some AFK kid while no mods are on.

#1 Can you not read? Because I clearly stated "I did not name the style, my students did"

#2 The style is mine because I freaking DESIGNED IT! HURRR DURRR

#3 It's not your issue to worry about. Honestly I don't give a damn what you think of my style. I designed it originally and then improved it with the help of friends. I give credit where credit is due. Now, would you kindly GTFO MY /b/.

/thread