Developers

[Adolf Hipster]

Why can't you just do more small updates than 1 update in 6 months l0l.

Example:
The shit with snipers, that if you scope there should be a xxx sec delay before shooting

thats a thing you can easily just do in some mins/hours..No need to put it into a big update that comes after 2038947089234092 months

[Dave]

Because we don't want to do an update for every little shit thing.

[Adolf Hipster]

Because we don't want to do an update for every little shit thing.

Doing more smaller updates looks better than just updating every year l0l.

When i read your sentence, it makes me think like this:
*Hack Released*
*Hackers ingame*
Update to fix the hack comes after some months.



PS:
There so many good things people suggested, if you read it you would see that the update would be a bit bigger.

[StephanM]

We try to update at least every month if I look at our previous updates.

[Hangover]

Doing more smaller updates looks better than just updating every year l0l.

When i read your sentence, it makes me think like this:
*Hack Released*
*Hackers ingame*
Update to fix the hack comes after some months.

I doubt the anti hack will be updated months after it has been bypassed :]

Some things are urgent, some aren't...

Anti hack update due to bypass is regarded as an urgent update...

Adding a delay to initial shot of sniper via GameTime isn't urgent at all. (Yes it won't take long to do at all, but is everyone dying for it? and is it urgent?)

Every developer has their own priorities.

[-AznNinja]

no man leave snipes alone
delay will mess up snipe ld

[Google]

Example:
The shit with snipers, that if you scope there should be a xxx sec delay before shooting

Don't you dare making snipers even more weak. GTfawkO.