Originally Posted by
DDaggerDD
I agree that its most likely that most of these kids will have a hard future, but with the dice example, i pointed out that its possible for most the dice rolls can result with lower outcomes, not that 1 of the combined rolls could result in a lower outcome. I was comparing that to most of these kids' future, that it may be at least possible that most of them could randomly have a good future. Compared to the dice rolls it could take quadrillion sets of quadrillion rolls, but its possible right? Also
its really stupid to say these ppl shouldnt be allowed to have kids jus because "most" of them will be poor (and uneducated)? thats the dumbest shit srsly lol, lazy ass solution. reminds me on wen nsa trying to get the rights to listen to all phone calls to spot possible terrorists/terror acts, casting the biggest net invading privacy and be like we will definately have a highly better chance to stop terror acts before they happen this way, not saying i dont agree with it butni remember some 1 arguing saying cast a big net to solve a problem, obviously problems can be solved and caught if u catch everything else with this net at the same time.
dumbest solution ever cuz u'd be preventing geniuses from being born and other things cuz not everyone starts out poor. dumbest solution ever lol but ur not srs so thats all good.