Juriën (09-24-2014)
Not to mention, a ban or mute can be done with a good explanation.
As we staff members trust each other if we say someone disrespected us or w/e.
No need for proof if you insult stephan or whoever, Dave/McSic or any superior would trust us with our decisions.
Especially if you're staff for a long long time (as I experienced)
With this in mind, couldn't you just lie since you know you're going to be 'believed' without any proof? I personally think that's ridiculous. Anything worth a ban or mute should require evidence to back it up and atleast show the banee/mutee what they've done regardless if it's a staff member or not.
I understand that for the most time staff members wouldn't, but there are always ones that would abuse given the power.
Last edited by Adam; 09-24-2014 at 11:56 PM.
Mike (09-24-2014)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)