This is a suggestion regarding the rule of max wins that I have commented on before several times in the past.
Spoiler!
While the spirit this rule was written with is fair and understandable, It cannot apply to all scenarios, which means that event moderators who go "by the book" with this rule tend to miss out on the community's desires.
Such event moderators would prefer to have no winners in events where someone has won a fourth time and everyone else failed to win. Not only is this pointless as it contradicts the spirit in which the rule was written with, but it fails to remember that people who win 3 points or more are also part of the community and since the rule attempts to prevent people from leaving, which it does not, it even adds 1-2 more people to the list of those who leave after reaching the cap.
If players are incapable of winning a round even when all other players who are able to and capped out are out of the game, how can you insist on re-rounding again and again until someone wins, until eventually giving up and giving no one the point?
Regardless of the above argument(s), as i mentioned before, the rule does not serve the purpose for which it was added. It absolutely does not prevent players who see someone in the event winning the first 3 rounds in a row from being demotivated and leave. If you want to keep the rule despite this, go ahead, but there are other possibilities for adjustments to rules to allow other players to win while keeping it fair for everyone.
Reply With Quote