-
Have you looked up lately?
-
ain't nobody got time for dat.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Nicki Minaj
ain't nobody got time for dat.
you look like you got plenty.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
K80L80
you look like you got plenty.
I have plenty of time for revision .-.
-
Conspiracy theorists, they are everywhere.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Nicki Minaj
I have plenty of time for revision .-.
this aint the bible
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wucas Pls
Conspiracy theorists, they are everywhere.
exactly.
"con·spir·a·cy noun \kən-ˈspir-ə-sē\
: a secret plan made by two or more people to do something that is harmful or illegal
: the act of secretly planning to do something that is harmful or illegal"
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
K80L80
this aint the bible
I don't read the Bible QQ
-
wth? dont know what this thread is all about, even this is too much for me! D=
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DDaggerDD
wth? dont know what this thread is all about, even this is too much for me! D=
are you fo srs?? for you ! man if you give up its HOPELESS!!
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
K80L80
are you fo srs?? for you ! man if you give up its HOPELESS!!
Like I said, ain't nobody got time for dat.
-
Dear god,
Even bigger paranoid then people who believe in the illuminati..
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
notSteff
Dear god,
Even bigger paranoide then people who believe in the illuminatie..
I believe in the Illuminati QQ
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Nicki Minaj
Like I said, ain't nobody got time for dat.
gotta love the sheeple
-
Seeing that this is in the debate section ill give you a serious answer.
Contrails are produced by the excretion of water vapor when combustion is produced in the jet engine. It is common chemistry to understand that when breaking down a fossil fuel (aka petrol) water is given off as well as heat. Cloud seeding may be a thing, but to have this lady go on Rush Limbaugh and talk about things she doesn't even know if silly, and if she would have researched it, would know the cloud seeding is used as a method to change weather patterns, not a whole fcking climate, that is impossible. Climates work on a much larger scale than a single weather pattern, and if flying a plane through the sky with a few chemicals could change global warming, I assure you, we would have done it already. She goes on to say that the CIA made her write an agreement dealing with her actions. What in the world is that about. The CIA is an intelligence organization, why would they even touch "chemtrails".
Honestly, this is the reason federal funding to science education shouldn't be cut, people start spouting random stuff about stuff they don't even understand.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
notSteff
Dear god,
Even bigger paranoide then people who believe in the illuminatie..
Illuminatis no joke, son
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wucas Pls
Seeing that this is in the debate section ill give you a serious answer.
Contrails are produced by the excretion of water vapor when combustion is produced in the jet engine. It is common chemistry to understand that when breaking down a fossil fuel (aka petrol) water is given off as well as heat. Cloud seeding may be a thing, but to have this lady go on Rush Limbaugh and talk about things she doesn't even know if silly, and if she would have researched it, would know the cloud seeding is used not as a method to change weather patterns, not a whole fcking climate, that is impossible. Climates work on a much larger scale than a single weather pattern. She goes on to say that the CIA made her write an agreement dealing with her actions. What in the world is that about. The CIA is an intelligence organization, why would they even touch "chemtrails".
Honestly, this is the reason federal funding to science education shouldn't be cut, people start spouting random stuff about stuff they don't even understand.
Im sorry but you and all the others have no right to debate when you have not fully researched everything that Im trying to debate.
-
I have one thing to say: YOLO.
-
So ill be back in a couple hours anyone that actually wants a real debate please read at least half the sites and watch both videos.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
K80L80
Illuminatis no joke, son
Im sorry but you and all the others have no right to debate when you have not fully researched everything that Im trying to debate.
i still dont know what this thread is about but i have an idea its about the trials for jets and saying they are like some alien sht or like reptilian clouds right men?
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
K80L80
Im sorry but you and all the others have no right to debate when you have not fully researched everything that Im trying to debate.
By only using your source materials, what in the world is a debate then; is this soviet Russia?
Honestly, I read through some of your sources, I didn't even know this was a conspiracy until you posted this thread. I am sorry that my life is built on concrete facts rather than how the government is out to kill us all, or kill JFK, or create demons, or whatever else people talk about when they go on Rush Limbaugh. If you consider that guy news, well that might just be your first problem.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DDaggerDD
i still dont know what this thread is about but i have an idea its about the trials for jets and saying they are like some alien sht or like reptilian clouds right men?
You're absolutely spot on!
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
notSteff
Dear god,
Even bigger paranoide then people who believe in the illuminatie..
paranoid* illuminati*
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Taint
paranoid* illuminati*
You forgot about God*
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wucas Pls
Cloud seeding may be a thing, but to have this lady go on Rush Limbaugh and talk about things she doesn't even know if silly, and if she would have researched it, would know the cloud seeding is used as a method to change weather patterns, not a whole fcking climate, that is impossible.
LOL! amiright? but rly wtf? HAH
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
K80L80
Illuminatis no joke, son
You just confirmed what I suspected, I won't be able to debate/discuss with you.
The reason here for is that your reply was very close minded.
Sorry if this might've seem rude but com'n..
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wucas Pls
By only using your source materials, what in the world is a debate then; is this soviet Russia?
Honestly, I read through some of your sources, I didn't even know this was a conspiracy until you posted this thread. I am sorry that my life is built on concrete facts rather than how the government is out to kill us all, or kill JFK, or create demons, or whatever else people talk about when they go on Rush Limbaugh. If you consider that guy news, well that might just be your first problem.
this thread dum cuz hes not summarizing info he has learned to make a debate and just posts crap. I hate that...
-
After reading all of the links, I must say this is very interesting.
-
I hope the Illuminati's next step is to either eliminate poor people or at least sterilize them so they don't reproduce.
-
never heard of this rush lim guy. anyway since i dont really have anything to say on this topic im out!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
soni
I hope the Illuminati's next step is to either eliminate poor people or at least sterilize them so they don't reproduce.
then i would be eliminated =(
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DDaggerDD
never heard of this rush lim guy. anyway since i dont really have anything to say on this topic im out!
then i would be eliminated =(
it's okay just donate to fg and you will be secured a place to live on :3
-
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DDaggerDD
this thread dum cuz hes not summarizing info he has learned to make a debate and just posts crap. I hate that...
And posting a dozen links and 2 videos is a debate? What.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wucas Pls
And posting a dozen links and 2 videos is a debate? What.
its lame. i see no debate wen i came here, just things to check out wen im mega bored
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DDaggerDD
never heard of this rush lim guy. anyway since i dont really have anything to say on this topic im out!
then i would be eliminated =(
Me as well, but I wouldn't mind it.
The way society is currently, where poor uneducated people reproduce far more than any other group can only lead to a shitty future for everyone. Poor families often have bad upbringings and they fail to raise their children into capable adults so their kids end up the same as they—having more kids to bring in that welfare money.
I think that is wrong on so many levels.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
soni
Me as well, but I wouldn't mind it.
The way society is currently, where poor uneducated people reproduce far more than any other group can only lead to a shitty future for everyone. Poor families often have bad upbringings and they fail to raise their children into capable adults so their kids end up the same as they—having more kids to bring in that welfare money.
poor doesnt mean uneducated. lol.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DDaggerDD
poor doesnt mean uneducated. lol.
Yeah I'm not linking poor with uneducated. I'm just saying that poor people who are uneducated reproduce the most.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
soni
Me as well, but I wouldn't mind it.
The way society is currently, where poor uneducated people reproduce far more than any other group can only lead to a shitty future for everyone. Poor families often have bad upbringings and they fail to raise their children into capable adults so their kids end up the same as they—having more kids to bring in that welfare money.
I think that is wrong on so many levels.
Oprah was born poor and she is now a few billion times richer than you, stop mocking with poor people..
It's not like you are rich or have a IQ of a genius so stop it isn't funny anymore.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
soni
Me as well, but I wouldn't mind it.
The way society is currently, where poor uneducated people reproduce far more than any other group can only lead to a shitty future for everyone. Poor families often have bad upbringings and they fail to raise their children into capable adults so their kids end up the same as they—having more kids to bring in that welfare money.
I think that is wrong on so many levels.
I am sure poor people can be educated!
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
soni
Yeah I'm not linking poor with uneducated. I'm just saying that poor people who are uneducated reproduce the most.
or they just die and have no kids.
on topic, i agree with wucas.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
notSteff
Oprah was born poor and she is now a few billion times richer than you, stop mocking with poor people..
It's not like you are rich or have a IQ of a genius so stop it isn't funny anymore.
I'm not trying to be funny. Oprah like many others are exceptions. Do you think that the majority of poor people will be Oprah in the future?
I'm not implying I'm rich or smart. It's quite the opposite. That's why I feel that way.
EDIT:
I mean think about it, many poor families will fail to raise their kids into capable adults one way or another.
They either have no time to spend with their kids because of work or can't afford to feed them. Just from that, can lead into complications in the future for those kids.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
soni
I'm not trying to be funny. Oprah like many others are exceptions. Do you think that the majority of poor people will be Oprah in the future?
I'm not implying I'm rich or smart. It's quite the opposite. That's why I feel that way.
ppl brought up in a poor family come out rich, middle class, stay poor for years and suddenly change their life around. It doesnt matter cuz nothin is wrong with it, its apart of being human. You can **** people and have kids simple as that. Theres no such thing as right and wrong.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DDaggerDD
ppl brought up in a poor family come out rich, middle class, stay poor for years and suddenly change their life around. It doesnt matter cuz nothin is wrong with it, its apart of being human. You can **** people and have kids simple as that. Theres no such thing as right and wrong.
That's the minority of cases. I'm considering the children who are brought into the world for the purpose of welfare money(in the US, the more kids you have the more welfare money you can get). I'm considering the kids who have ****ed up upbringings and cannot function in society. I'm considering the kids who don't have those god-given opportunities to turn their life around or are simply not capable of doing anything to save themselves(due to shit upbringing).
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
soni
That's the minority of cases. I'm considering the children who are brought into the world for the purpose of welfare money(in the US, the more kids you have the more welfare money you can get). I'm considering the kids who have ****ed up upbringings and cannot function in society. I'm considering the kids who don't have those god-given opportunities to turn their life around or are simply not capable of doing anything to save themselves(due to shit upbringing).
well no u just said poor ppl in general lol. Now its about families that abuse welfare and thats a different topic
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DDaggerDD
well no u just said poor ppl in general lol. Now its about families that abuse welfare and thats a different topic
Read again. I said "uneducated poor people" and I don't mean that all poor people are uneducated.
These are the people who create families that end up bringing innocent kids into this harsh world and not raising/preparing them for it.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
soni
Read again. I said "uneducated poor people" and I don't mean that all poor people are uneducated.
These are the people who create families that end up bringing innocent kids into this harsh world and not raising/preparing them for it.
there is no topic or argument here, i dont see anything being said. Because your conclusions are false its stupid. You concluded that being poor leads to not raising kids properly as a fact. Which it isnt so theres nothing to reply to. Also what is raising kids properly?
also, those reptilian clouds, amiright men? cant get enough of them!
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DDaggerDD
there is no topic or argument here, i dont see anything being said. Because your conclusions are false its stupid. You concluded that being poor leads to not raising kids properly as a fact. Which it isnt so theres nothing to reply to. Also what is raising kids properly?
also, those reptilian clouds, amiright men? cant get enough of them!
Can I just say that this topic has gone out the window.......
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DDaggerDD
there is no topic or argument here, i dont see anything being said. Because your conclusions are false its stupid. You concluded that being poor leads to not raising kids properly as a fact. Which it isnt so theres nothing to reply to. Also what is raising kids properly?
My first post is about bettering the world by removing poor people or at least stopping them from reproducing.
Being poor may not always lead to not raising kids properly, but it increases the likelihood of it. It limits your options as a parent.
Raising kids properly is guaranteeing a healthy diet and ensuring that they are capable of doing what a normal person should be able to do.
EDIT:
In the end we're not really debating my first post, but debating whether or not poor parents fail to raise their kids properly. Which is true the majority of times.
Anecdotes about poor people becoming rich somehow don't do shit for an argument btw.
-
mis read your reply its all over the place. but, cant teply to it because since being poor doesnt mean being uneducated in general, then being uneducated from being poor doesnt mean the uneducated parents will automatically flaw the kids up bringing since they may or may not be uneducated just because they themselves grew up in a poor family. The family they grew up in could have been middle class then went poor after sole wrong finnancial mistakes. again, somce being popr doesnt mean uneducated, cannot say these uneducated poor parents will or most likely raise kids for doom since the parents may or may not be educated regardless of how much money they have.
-
Judging from the posts I've read so far, I must admit that I can't tell what this topic's all about.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DDaggerDD
mis read your reply its all over the place. but, cant teply to it because since being poor doesnt mean being uneducated in general, then being uneducated from being poor doesnt mean the uneducated parents will automatically flaw the kids up bringing since they may or may not be uneducated just because they themselves grew up in a poor family. The family they grew up in could have been middle class then went poor after sole wrong finnancial mistakes. again, somce being popr doesnt mean uneducated, cannot say these uneducated poor parents will or most likely raise kids for doom since the parents may or may not be educated regardless of how much money they have.
In the end we're not really debating my first post, but debating whether or not poor parents fail to raise their kids properly. Which is true the majority of times.
Anecdotes about poor people becoming rich somehow don't do shit for an argument btw.
Damn man, no ones saying that all poor people are this or that.
I'm saying that poor people who happen to be uneducated reproduce the most and that they often fail to raise their kids.
> The family they grew up in could have been middle class then went poor after sole wrong finnancial mistakes
What does this do for me? I'm talking about one specific group of people. Poor people who are uneducated.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
soni
My first post is about bettering the world by removing poor people or at least stopping them from reproducing.
Being poor may not always lead to not raising kids properly, but it increases the likelihood of it. It limits your options as a parent.
Raising kids properly is guaranteeing a healthy diet and ensuring that they are capable of doing what a normal person should be able to do.
EDIT:
In the end we're not really debating my first post, but debating whether or not poor parents fail to raise their kids properly. Which is true the majority of times.
Anecdotes about poor people becoming rich somehow don't do shit for an argument btw.
im poor but i have enough to eat properly most of the time i think, and since the main argument here is so far mainly based on that less money = less food = harder to grow up ad a child with barely any food aka not in a poor family but literally broke, then obvly broke children WITH less food will have a tough down hill future for many years. (reptilian clouds oki men), but you havent connected how being uneducated parents means this result is likely, only said being poor i guess broke mainly results in this. but w/e wrong thread. reptilian jets i agree with wucas
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DDaggerDD
im poor but i have enough to eat properly most of the time i think, and since the main argument here is so far mainly based on that less money = less food = harder to grow up ad a child with barely any food aka not in a poor family but literally broke, then obvly broke children WITH less food will have a tough down hill future for many years. (reptilian clouds oki men), but you havent connected how being uneducated parents means this result is likely, only said being poor i guess broke mainly results in this. but w/e wrong thread. reptilian jets i agree with wucas
It's more like
less money = less food
less money = more time working
more time working = less time spent with kids
I didn't even mention that less money means that they'll live in a poorer neighborhood and go to a shitty public school where other shitty kids exist to corrupt their own.
All these little factors have an effect.
I feel so strongly about this because my family's poor. I was already born sickly and with a shit immune system but the horrible diet only makes me worse. Also I was raised by a single mom. You know poor families are also very often families where there is a single parent right? No father figure in my life and that ****ed me up as well in many ways.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
soni
In the end we're not really debating my first post, but debating whether or not poor parents fail to raise their kids properly. Which is true the majority of times.
Anecdotes about poor people becoming rich somehow don't do shit for an argument btw.
Damn man, no ones saying that all poor people are this or that.
I'm saying that poor people who happen to be uneducated reproduce the most and that they often fail to raise their kids.
> The family they grew up in could have been middle class then went poor after sole wrong finnancial mistakes
What does this do for me? I'm talking about one specific group of people. Poor people who are uneducated.
u been sayin poor = uneducated been going on that till now, since ur disregarding it. and no poor uneducated people dont usually have more kids than any other that had money and may be uneducated as well.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
soni
It's more like
less money = less food
less money = more time working
more time working = less time spent with kids
All these little factors have an effect.
I feel so strongly about this because my family's poor. I was already born sickly and with a shit immune system but the horrible diet only makes me worse. Also I was raised by a single mom. You know poor families are also very often families where there is a single parent right? No father figure in my life and that ****ed me up as well in many ways.
you still dont have any arguement just because people are poor and uneducated doesnt mean they are more likely to have more kids than the next person. You argument is flawed and plagued with other insertions about things that arent true, so the main argument is un creditable.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DDaggerDD
u been sayin poor = uneducated been going on that till now, since ur disregarding it. and no poor uneducated people dont usually have more kids than any other that had money and may be uneducated as well.
you still dont have any arguement just because people are poor and uneducated doesnt mean they are more likely to have more kids than the next person. You argument is flawed and plagued with other insertions about things that arent true, so the main argument is un creditable.
http://www.statista.com/statistics/2...ome-in-the-us/
There's more to say but I didn't think the argument would reach this point.
It's only natural that poor people who are uneducated(I mean if you were smart and poor, why would you bring kids you couldn't raise into this harsh world?) cannot afford to live in a good neighborhood with a good school. It's obvious that they end up in ghetto-like places and they send their kids to the crappy public school where other shitty kids influence their own for the worse. Is this not true?
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Nicki Minaj
Can I just say that this topic has gone out the window.......
he just spammed links thoe and never stated an argument in the thread's post lol. was bound to happen
Quote:
Originally Posted by
soni
still doesnt say just because they are poor and uneducated, uneducated meaning havent gone to grade school or not finishing school. This info shows trends, but isnt showing that the main reason to poor people having more kids than non poor people is because of less money.
Your argument constantly changed from the start. If your saying ppl that are poor and grow up able to have a family are more likely to leave their kids in a greater and harder future path for themselves okay. but that doesnt mean these kids' whole future is gone until they die just because of a few years.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DDaggerDD
he just spammed links thoe and never stated an argument in the thread's post lol. was bound to happen
still doesnt say just because they are poor and uneducated, uneducated meaning havent gone to grade school or not finishing school. This info shows trends, but isnt showing that the main reason to poor people having more kids than non poor people is because of less money.
Your argument constantly changed from the start. If your saying ppl that are poor and grow up able to have a family are more likely to leave their kids in a greater and harder future path for themselves okay. but that doesnt mean these kids' whole future is gone until they die just because of a few years.
I made an edit earlier.
>There's more to say but I didn't think the argument would reach this point.
It's only natural that poor people who are uneducated(I mean if you were smart and poor, why would you bring kids you couldn't raise into this harsh world?) cannot afford to live in a good neighborhood with a good school. It's obvious that they end up in ghetto-like places and they send their kids to the crappy public school where other shitty kids influence their own for the worse. Is this not true?
My argument constantly changes only because you keep assuming a bunch of things bro. There are a lot of things I haven't said and don't feel like saying because I didn't want to put so much work into this.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wucas Pls
By only using your source materials, what in the world is a debate then; is this soviet Russia?
Honestly, I read through some of your sources, I didn't even know this was a conspiracy until you posted this thread. I am sorry that my life is built on concrete facts rather than how the government is out to kill us all, or kill JFK, or create demons, or whatever else people talk about when they go on Rush Limbaugh. If you consider that guy news, well that might just be your first problem.
No, I already know your side of the story, so you have to research mine, then you can tell me what you believe. Are you so sure that your life is based on concrete facts? I dont think you've done your history research. Its a fact that governments dont think the "normal" human populace can comprehend things that they know, and to avoid widespread panic do not tell them. Or to avoid a revolt. If you havent been paying attention to what has been happening in politics, oh since before you were born, then you wouldnt be able to understand the concept of someone lying directly to your face I guess. Its not a "theory" that I have that they are spraying aluminum, barium, stronium, prozac..etc, its a fact. If you actually read some of the sites, or watched the "What in the World are they Spraying" video, you would see the water quality and soil test results of several people from several labs proving the high toxicity levels of these chemicals on days that chemtrails heavily cover the sky. Which is pretty much everyday now. I know what a contrail is. Im also not saying that they are spraying it to kill us, so I dont know where you got that from. I guess reality is a hard pill to swallow and you have to make me look like the insane one. Its ok Im used to it. I have many different theories as to WHY they are spraying, and those are the theories. Not the fact that chemtrails exist. One of my theories that they are spraying is for weather manipulation, or High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Frequency_Active_Auroral_Research_Program
Which would make sense that a government agency would want to have control over the weather. Think of the war strategies they could use with this? Here you can find the list of patents on weather modification by the United States Patent and Trademark Office http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/an-extensive-list-of-patents/
oh also, I dont like Rush Limbaugh, but it was a small win for a group I am in. The fact that it got to mainstream media for once is amazing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
notSteff
You just confirmed what I suspected, I won't be able to debate/discuss with you.
The reason here for is that your reply was very close minded.
Sorry if this might've seem rude but com'n..
You say that Im closed minded after no one fully researched what I posted but decided to post random garbage posts anyways, you included? lel
-
When I look in the sky and see that shit I think "Ooo there must have been a jet flying there". This bitch went to a whole different level.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DDaggerDD
he just spammed links thoe and never stated an argument in the thread's post lol. was bound to happen
still doesnt say just because they are poor and uneducated, uneducated meaning havent gone to grade school or not finishing school. This info shows trends, but isnt showing that the main reason to poor people having more kids than non poor people is because of less money.
Your argument constantly changed from the start. If your saying ppl that are poor and grow up able to have a family are more likely to leave their kids in a greater and harder future path for themselves okay. but that doesnt mean these kids' whole future is gone until they die just because of a few years.
you
Quote:
Originally Posted by
soni
I made an edit earlier.
>There's more to say but I didn't think the argument would reach this point.
It's only natural that poor people who are uneducated(I mean if you were smart and poor, why would you bring kids you couldn't raise into this harsh world?) cannot afford to live in a good neighborhood with a good school. It's obvious that they end up in ghetto-like places and they send their kids to the crappy public school where other shitty kids influence their own for the worse. Is this not true?
My argument constantly changes only because you keep assuming a bunch of things bro. There are a lot of things I haven't said and don't feel like saying because I didn't want to put so much work into this.
and you GTFO or stay on topic
Can a mod please clean this thread of the what 4? pages of off topic comments
-
I really don't think anything is being sprayed.. I like to let science describe why that happens and I think science did a pretty good job. Then there is the 'conspiracy theorists' that only have their theory... and not science..
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Katsuro
I really don't think anything is being sprayed.. I like to let science describe why that happens and I think science did a pretty good job. Then there is the 'conspiracy theorists' that only have their theory... and not science..
If you dont think anything is being sprayed than what are you refering to in "I like to let science describe why that happens"
-
That as in contrails. That is what we are talking about right? .-.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Katsuro
That as in contrails. That is what we are talking about right? .-.
So you spent about, what 5 minutes browsing this thread before you commented? Im guessing you didnt care like the rest of them to even watch the second video?
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
K80L80
you
and you GTFO or stay on topic
Can a mod please clean this thread of the what 4? pages of off topic comments
LOL!! it would be like 5+ pages if I didn't make a thread called stop posting here and we moved the conversation lol ourselves lol.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
K80L80
So you spent about, what 5 minutes browsing this thread before you commented? Im guessing you didnt care like the rest of them to even watch the second video?
Umm.. No? I'm well aware on the conspiracy theory of "chemtrails".. But that is all it is... a conspiracy theory.
I'm not saying it may not be true and that conspiracy theories don't come true. That would be wrong.. I mean our government is clearly putting internet and telephone communications under surveillance.. Not to mention the Nixon conspiracy.. But something like that makes more sense to me than the government simply poisoning us for unknown reasons. Even if you say there is reasons none of them are valid or proven..
I have been around the internet long enough to know not to believe everything you see/read on the internet. I don't plan to get into some silly debate on how the government is slowly poisoning us for whatever reason. You might as well talk about how the government is supposedly covering up the radiation poisoning from fukushima that has leaked into the pacific and we are all consuming it from seafood.. Or maybe how all of our wireless devices are supposedly killing us slowly by giving us cancer.. Or maybe how the government supposedly is covering up the existence of UFO's.. That was just a few off the top of my head. Worrying about something that may not even be true is just silly.. Might as well have some girl worry about getting pregnant from a guy she haven't even had sex with.
