yay macro~
yay macro~
~Credits to GeorgeGFX for the Signature]
"Dreams are short-time happiness"
-Faky
you can do 99 things for someone and all they'll remember is the one thing you didn't do
I can QBF in 1 jump and no f12 required.
The only legit qbf that is relevant for now requires : flip, kodachi's & atleast dngx4 tbf speed.
You lack of the most important part of the requirements as it's seems from the "tbf" while you're going down after the forcelag.
Legit QBF: Jump of a house and do QBF lol
Having to be flipped to qbf does not seem legit and I'm not understanding your last statement.
Edit: To elaborate, I believe I know the method that your speaking of that involves being flipped then performing the qbf after landing. How would that make it any more legit when taking into consideration the flip landing mechanics?
Last edited by Revvy; 01-24-2015 at 02:26 PM.
sad thing is.. it's 2015 and i still can't tbf ..fml
Dan my idol https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lya3qnI1L-s[/B][/CENTER]
The most legit qbf you're ever going to find is this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYRGmN8pmvA
No, krostine didn't do a legit qbf. If you compare his qbf to the speed required for me to obtain qbf, it's very obvious his was unlegit. He probably hooked a dll to change the getdisttofloor (which is set at 80.f), to something a bit lower like 60.f. His speed was nowhere near what's required for qbf. By the time you do a tbf, the getdist to floor is already lower than 80.f, so you can't perform a 4th slash without heavy glitching like in that video. It's more legit than screenlag because unlike screenlag, you are doing a qbf, you simply require the flip to change the animationset for the first block from start>loop>end, to start>end>start>loop>end>start>loop>end>start>loop>end. A true qbf without bugs will never be possible, there simply isn't enough time in the jump to perform one. To this day krostine & mazerin still insist on arguing with me about how qbf can be performed. If they had any knowledge of the source and how animation cancelling works they would understand why no one in their right mind would believe their methods.
Last edited by Jetman; 01-25-2015 at 06:11 AM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)