Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    New Member

    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Country
    Posts
    11
    Thanked
    1
    Thanks
    5
    Suggestion type:
    Forum/FGunZ/Other


    Suggestion title: Visual key presses


    Suggestion description: Can we have (optional) visual ingame key presses?

    So you can see what keys other people press. I think this can help a lot of people.

    Similar to what QL has:





    Last edited by Art1; 07-08-2016 at 12:58 PM.

  2. The following user said thank you to Art1 for this useful post:

    Dante (07-09-2016)

  3. #2
    Jonathan pls's Avatar Uh suma luma duma luma

    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Country
    Posts
    826
    Thanked
    1,312
    Thanks
    494
    What is it good for though

  4. #3
    Banned

    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    777
    Thanked
    140
    Thanks
    144
    it can help for spamming stuff like hacks

  5. #4
    New Member

    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Country
    Posts
    11
    Thanked
    1
    Thanks
    5
    What is it good for though
    Basically you can see what keys people press so you can learn from other people.

    it can help for spamming stuff like hacks
    You mean to recognize hacks?

  6. #5
    Banned

    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Country
    Posts
    2,744
    Thanked
    133
    Thanks
    657
    Feel like it would be in the way, especially because quite a few keys are used.
    And it would have to be interchangeable if you don't use the default keys, even then, it should be optional.

  7. #6
    Banned

    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Country
    Posts
    303
    Thanked
    106
    Thanks
    262
    Originally Posted by Art1 View Post
    Basically you can see what keys people press so you can learn from other people.


    You mean to recognize hacks?
    No, that would be retarded. When you use Winapi to send keys(or any input) to a window handle, you're also sending a flag to the window letting the process know exactly what you're doing. So if someone wants to automate actions(shotbot etc), you would not need this feature in order to "recognize" it.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)